Thursday, 7 October 2010
International Relative Exchange Vol. 20
Special thanks to AppsTech Server Solutions, who spent the weekend laminating our new server units. We remain assured that no foreign bodies (i.e. crisps and Slush Puppies) will be able to find their way into THESE £20000 uninsurable business commodities.
Monday, 13 September 2010
International Relative Exchange Vol. 19
Introducing our Premium Swap Service, where the individuals you select undertake the acclimatisation training of your choice. We currently offer 3 training packages; Onix (your swap is trained how to appear receptive and interested in the opinions of others, most notably yourself, without any nominal sense of reciprocation), Goose (your swap will be immediately self sufficient, and will generate a guaranteed amount of income for your household after 3 weeks, with negligible meaningful contact), and Raptor (your swap will steal from your guests, destroy their marriages, and still be declared 'a triumph' at the end of the evening). Call now for our special introductory rates, tailored to your needs.
Friday, 10 September 2010
Royalty Free Idea: Machine Greetings
Nothing torpedoed a birthday like an automated greetings card from Bradford and Bingley. Maybe I was being ungrateful, but even at the age of 4 or 5, I was pretty sure that whatever they had written in that card, they didn't mean it. Probably through some ancient survival instinct kicking in, you could feel that either Bradford or Bingley (probably Bingley, Bradford being too busy schmoozing with high level investors to be thinking about birthdays or children) had really just interjected into your celebrations for any new cash on the go.
If they had been more blatant, fine. A simple letter observing the likelihood of an individual's date of birth coinciding with a sudden influx of capital which would then go on to explain the mutual benefits of my temporarily lending said capital to their organisation would have appealed to me (being, as I was, a terrifying emotionless robot from the future, even back then). They sent instead a note from that gurning yellow cartoon cat from the 80's, doing the same cartwheels he had done for every other 5 year old while avoiding ever mentioning why his employers had saw fit to deploy him in my direction (he also saw fit to continually remind me that I was 'in his club', the benefits of which were the birthday card, and a terrible rate of interest. I'm pretty sure I also had to pay to be in that club).
So it's nice that they've stopped - being insincerely reminded of financial responsibility via lab-generated whimsy on your only special yearly day could've had an entirely different effect on me as an adult. But it could so easily be so much worse than just that. It's perfectly conceivable that, with all the personal information that's floating around at the moment (Broken Britain etc.), you could receive targeted greetings for things like going-on-holiday, buying a new fridge (bigger fridge, implied bigger family, is Grandad moving in? Congratulations!?!), a new job, even what your Amazon purchases imply (and the subsequent apology letters for drawing the wrong conclusions from your Amazon purchases). Letters from Interflora when they think that you're in love, letters from Ben and Jerry's when it wasn't reciprocal.
Yes, I know - this already exists, to an extent, but it's all done via email, and therefore easy to mentally filter. If it were done physically, and personally (i.e. a man employed by every company to write greetings cards all day), it would have greater resonance. Primarily, it would create a whole swathe of new jobs (and in the greetings card writing sector, itself suffering retractions as a result of the boom in online personalisation) which could easily be state funded, to an extent. Better than that, on receiving such a card, you would know that it had been penned by someone equally, if not more, disenchanted with the sending company as you are, forming a bond between distant men like no other. Which, in a kind of self defeating way, would only humanise said sending conglomerate even more. Still, at least there would be a genuinely human element in the process, drastically increasing the chances of there being a memorably sweary "f*ck your job!" mass birthday card send out from a disgruntled employee to a generation of 7 year olds, who would subsequently never quite believe that it didn't in fact come from the pilot of Thunderbird 2 on behalf of the Woolwich. THAT would be a birthday.
Thursday, 9 September 2010
International Relative Exchange Vol.18
All swaps come with their own clothes, documentation, a 7 day survival kit, and now a £15 gift voucher redeemable at Amazon.co.uk. Shop online with Amazon.co.uk for books, CDs, DVDs, games and more, and with a variety of delivary options available, there's something to suit everyone. Log on to Amazon.co.uk now for a free 15 day trial with Amazon Prime, the new way to recieve your Amazon.co.uk orders. Amazon.co.uk.
Wednesday, 1 September 2010
Normal Post: The Right Thoughts
We all have our weaknesses. We won't go into yours, but mine include the last 15 minutes of Bargain Hunt ( 'Pure Hunt', or 'Hunt Prime' to aficionados), passport-sized sketchbooks and romanticising public information services in drawing form. My biggest weakness, though, would have to be Not Thinking the Right Thoughts at the Right Time. That maybe seems like a frightening imposition on a rightly treasured liberty, but it's reasonable to assume that, at certain times, only certain thoughts are helpful, and as such your mind can be relied upon to only produce thoughts directly relative to that situation.
Not so. The other day, for example. I should've been considering possible alternatives to grouping and sending jpg worksheets via email, as a third of them failed to initiate properly upon receipt. Instead, I was considering a mildly irritating children's television show from when I was young(6 billion years ago).
You probobly remember "The Queen's Nose", the story of a young girl who was given (ugh) a magic 50 pence piece (I hate typing that)that could grant her wishes. Like most things, I didn't enjoy it, though largely because, like the majority of children's fiction in the young-people-randomly-gifted-with-deus-ex-machina artefacts-of-extraordinary-power genre, it didn't involve said young person having fun with the miraculous object of their amazing good fortune. Rather, they spent 90% of their time fretting over the ramifications of being so carefree and wishing for pleasant frivolities like 'as many sweets as you could eat' or 'magic horse'. If they DID have the temerity to foolishly enjoy themselves, said folly would be cicumstantionally demonstrated to them, usually via some traumatic family event caused by the wish which they would have to subsequently un-wish (with another wish).
I'm not one for enjoying myself without the appropriate checks being made and criteria fullfilled beforehand. But I wouldn't go on children's television and start lecturing kids on how their thoughtless idealistic whimsies might one day kill us all. That doesn't seem fair. Perhaps the aforementioned genre of fiction could be explained away as the renements of the 70's Cold War paranoia entertainment craze, where every piece of fiction had to include the human population decimated by something, and the survivors living in the country, crying and being chased by either monster plants or one another.
But if they wanted to be all down on the idea of a magic penny, why didn't they just go all out and impose (I'm getting excited!) proper real world conditions on the story? For instance, a girl running round Kensington with an omnipotent 50p can't possibly go unnoticed for long. In steps the government. The government could use the wishes for unimaginable gain, but it needs the girl to make those wishes for them. Luckily, the girl herself would only have wished for things like an ice cream factory, or her sister being turned into a pigeon - wishes which the state can more than provide her with (well, they'd just lock her sister up and catch a pigeon from somewhere, but it's definately do-able), and in abundance. Hence, the girl gets unlimited wishes (up from 10 or however many), while Great Britain gains an unimaginable superweapon.
Let's be realistic, though. It's not like the government would be happy just 'making 10 powerful wishes' and leaving it at that. They'd want to research the coin, discover the root of its power, harness or even duplicate it - all the better to guard against other child-activated super-relics (Bernard's Watch and Magic Grandad spring to mind). Inevitably, things in the research facility testing the coin would go wrong, it'd all end up like a cross between Jim'll Fix It and System Shock 2. But that's only if things happened realistically.
My other big weakness is not knowing when and how to end something properly, so I'll leave you to ponder the above while I try and send those jpgs. Again.
Tuesday, 17 August 2010
Royalty Free Idea: Christian Bale Shouts the Shapes
The problem with uploading big batches of sketch and slowly drip feeding it into a blog is that it can often feel quite dated by the time it comes to post. Case in point; the above post-it, drawn shortly after Christian Bale's now largely immemorable outburst on the set of Terminator 3.
So I won't linger. That said, there's nothing like listening to radio comedy from the 40's, for instance, and not having the first idea why some jokes are funnier than others, purely because the references haven't stood the test of time. Sometimes seemingly innocuos observations get spontanious cheers or staggered laughter or something equally uninclusive. But you can still laugh, mainly because it honestly just seems like a crowd revelling in the joy of language and it's deployment. And that's always something to celebrate.
Monday, 16 August 2010
Normal Post: Holiday Character Opportunity
As a big fan of holidays (of both the forced and unforced variety), a subject of personal interest is how they come about in the first place. Not the novelty-free ones - celebrating a bank holiday is a recognised medical signal that you're depressed, and the long summer holidays you have in school were only ever designed to prop up the now booming nostalga markets (the kind that sell imported foam cereals and untransformble Transfomer statues to ronrey men) by creating vast continents of terminally boring time that could only ever be filled by actively just-buying-stuff. No, not those holidays.
I'm specifically interested in holidays that have some kind of character associated with them, Santa Claus being the obvious example. It's how these characters come into being that's the fun bit. Perhaps they're a bit like latter day memes, ideas that gradually take hold of the collective imagination through a sub-concious desire for that kind of thing to exist (like we all want a giant rabbit with an unlimited supply of chocolate whimsically circumanvigating our home security systems every year).
It could also be a guilt thing. If you're christian, for example, you believe that Jesus died for our sins on the cross on Easter. While I suppose it's a good thing that that particular act was never given the novelty airbrush, it'd probobly be equally galling to find that the day of your sacrafice (and the subsequent holiday weekend you bestowed on generations to come) was permanantly subject to a takeover bid from the aforementioned chocolate ninja hare, and that the large swathes of the public were fine with that. I'm not saying that everyone has to be into Jesus or NOTHING AT ALL. It's just that it feels a bit like the equivelant of, say, a national holiday for an important religious figure like Mohammed, or even a respected contemporary leader like Gahdi or Mandela, being hijacked by the public desire to believe in a magic wise-cracking penny who can grant wishes.
To be fair, though, I think Jesus is comfortably winning the fight for Easter. No one seems massively bothered about investing in the Easter Bunny, he's the least represented holiday mascot going. There are no real definiatve images of him, because no companies or corporations see any profit in defining him. So it's left to comman conscensus to flesh him out, which means he ends up with sometimes a basket, sometimes a bow, and zero to say for himself. No backstory, no cool explanation for how he breaks into your house. Why is he even giving out chocolate? Nobody cares. Like the trope 'unpopular lonely rich kid', he tries to buy your interest, which lasts precisely as long as his money does. And it's funny how the Easter Bunny melts away after the big Santa reveal. Nobody 'finds out' about the Easter Bunny, because nobody is that stupid.to properly believe in him in the first place (I'm beginning to think I might have some terrible, repressed beef with the Easter Bunny, actually, so I might just move on).
We believe more in the Tooth Fairy than the Easter Bunny because the story provides an irrational explanation to something even more irrational i.e. giving children money for their old teeth. Giving children money for their teeth. Chocolate at Easter is sort-of plausible in that, even at a young age, you can figure out that it's all about money and jobs and needing a break and indulging and cheering up for a while. Giving children money for their old teeth is just stupid, even if your subsequent explanatory trip to Wikipedia tells you otherwise, because most folk giving their kids money for their old teeth don't know why they do it in the first place, and have to pass it off as 'fun' and 'part of the magic of childhood'. Why not make understanding how the NHS works 'part of the magic of childhood'? I'm going to be a terrible parent. It'll be fun to explain to whoever ends up as my child that I'm reaching under their pillow because I want to buy their teeth off of them, in the middle of the night.
I'm probobly typing at length about this, though, because it's what happened to Santa Claus that worries me. From my limited knowledge of the myth (being interested in novelty holidays doesn't actually involve any reading or research or learning of any sort), it stems from the story of some old chap who went around his village giving the children carved wooden toys/ the god Odin raining down presents on those who left their nosh-filled boots out for his steed / St Nicholas leaving gold for three penniless single women (nice!) so that they could afford to marry. It's probobly all of those, and none of them at the same time.
But the gradual morphing of the stories into what we know today is quite unsettling, in that the same thing could very well happen to me. If this period in time were ever to be looked back upon as one of, say, deluded hubris, who better to be morphed into its terrifying anti-mascot? I'd presumabley be used to scare children into choosing a career with prospects, or at least a mindset of productivity, diligence, and calm, resourceful action. My biggest worry is that, to illustrate the importance of developing into a well-rounded individual, I wouldn't end up being some cool-evil sarcastic robot or anti-hero with awesome hair. My 'character' would probobly turn out like one of those animatronic cobbler puppets, fated to fruitlessly hammer away at nothing, all the while with a big gurn on my face (it always annoys me when you see one of those idiots mugging away while not actually hammering any shoe).
But I'll probobly be dead before that character comes into being, so that's all right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)